PQC Security
Japan flagJPMonitoring

Japan

CRYPTREC tracks PQC standardization and has begun evaluating NIST's finalized algorithms for inclusion in Japan's approved cryptographic list, without yet setting a binding migration deadline.

Japan's post-quantum cryptography posture is classified as monitoring, led by CRYPTREC / NISC.

Japan's cryptographic governance runs through CRYPTREC (Cryptography Research and Evaluation Committees), which maintains Japan's official list of recommended cryptographic algorithms for government and critical systems. CRYPTREC has a long track record of closely tracking, and sometimes contributing to, international standardization, including NIST's PQC process.

What's required

As of the latest published CRYPTREC guidance, Japan has not issued a binding PQC migration mandate. CRYPTREC is in an active evaluation phase for NIST's finalized ML-KEM, ML-DSA, and SLH-DSA algorithms, consistent with its historical approach of adopting internationally vetted algorithms into its own recommended list (CRYPTREC Ciphers List) rather than developing a fully separate domestic standard.

NISC (National center of Incident readiness and Strategy for Cybersecurity) coordinates broader national cybersecurity strategy, within which quantum-readiness is an emerging theme that is not yet codified.

Who it applies to

  • Government systems and agencies, which are expected to follow CRYPTREC's recommended algorithm list once PQC entries are finalized.
  • Critical infrastructure operators, under general cybersecurity strategy guidance from NISC, though without PQC-specific binding timelines yet.
  • Private sector organizations, who typically follow CRYPTREC recommendations as a de facto standard even without legal compulsion, given the list's role in government procurement.

What organizations need to do

  1. Monitor CRYPTREC's ciphers list directly: updates adding ML-KEM/ML-DSA/SLH-DSA will be the clearest signal of Japan's position hardening from "monitoring" to "guidance" or "mandated."
  2. Expect Japan's eventual approach to closely mirror NIST's algorithm choices, unlike China's sovereign-algorithm path. This reduces the risk of needing a separate cryptographic profile for the Japanese market.
  3. Organizations already complying with NIST-aligned PQC migration for other markets are unlikely to face additional Japan-specific algorithm work, only process/inventory documentation aligned to CRYPTREC's eventual requirements.

Enforcement and current status

No enforcement mechanism exists yet specific to PQC migration. CRYPTREC's list carries practical authority through government procurement requirements, but a binding private-sector mandate with penalties has not been published as of this writing.

FAQ: Japan and PQC

Does Japan have a post-quantum cryptography (PQC) law?
No binding post-quantum law is recorded here for Japan. This page tracks it at the "Monitoring" level and has not yet been scored against the rubric, so treat the primary sources listed below as the full extent of what we verified.
What is Japan's PQC migration deadline?
None. No migration deadline has been published for Japan by any regulator we checked, including CRYPTREC / NISC.
Does Japan require a Cryptographic Bill of Materials (CBOM)?
No cryptographic inventory or CBOM requirement is recorded here for Japan. This page has not yet been scored against the rubric, so treat the primary sources listed below as the full extent of what we verified.