China
China's Cryptography Law and Commercial Cryptography Regulations, its two governing statutes, contain zero mentions of quantum cryptography of any kind. Neither of China's two national standards registries (GM/T, GB/T) has a single post-quantum standard; both list only quantum key distribution, a different technology. SCA has funded PQC research since 2023 and its national algorithm-selection competition has been running since February 2025, but the public-key track's own submission deadline of 30 June 2026 has passed with no results published.
China's post-quantum cryptography posture is classified as guidance, led by State Cryptography Administration (SCA / 国家密码管理局). It scores 20/100 on this tracker's rubric, an early-stage or narrowly-scoped rule, and that is not a measure of how secure or advanced the country actually is.
What's verified
China's State Cryptography Administration (SCA / 国家密码管理局), the country's national cryptography regulator, published Announcement No. 46 on 12-13 December 2023, releasing application guidelines for the first batch of projects under its National Cryptography Science Fund. The guidelines explicitly scope research funding toward post-quantum cryptography: "针对'先存储后解密'攻击,研究现役密码协议与抗量子公钥密码算法的融合技术" (targeting "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks, research integration techniques between incumbent cryptographic protocols and quantum-resistant public-key cryptography), and call for research on "密码基础设施、密码设备抗量子迁移的总体技术架构" (overall technical architecture for quantum-resistant migration of cryptographic infrastructure and devices).
This is a real, dated, SCA-authored document specifically addressing PQC, not a restatement of NIST's or any other body's targets, and not the previously circulated but unsupported claim (in an earlier version of this page) attributing a five-year plan and SM-series details to SCA without a verifiable source. It funds research rather than mandating migration, and does not define a CBOM-equivalent inventory artifact.
China's two governing statutes say nothing about quantum
We read both laws that actually govern cryptography in China, in full. The Commercial Cryptography Regulations (State Council Order No. 760, effective 1 July 2023) and the Cryptography Law of the PRC (effective 1 January 2020) contain zero occurrences of "quantum," "anti-quantum," or "post-quantum" in any form, in either document, from first article to last. Chapter 2 of the Regulations, the chapter on science, technology, and standardization, speaks only in algorithm-neutral terms about promoting "indigenous innovation in commercial cryptography." Whatever China eventually requires on post-quantum migration, it is not yet written into the statutes that set its cryptography rules.
Neither national standards registry has a post-quantum standard
We checked both of China's national standards catalogues directly rather than sampling search results. The 密码行业标准化技术委员会 (Cryptography Industry Standardization Technical Committee) publishes the complete list of all 177 current GM/T standards; we pulled the full catalogue and searched it for post-quantum content. The only quantum-related entries are GM/T 0108-2021 and GM/T 0114-2021, both specifications for BB84 quantum key distribution hardware — a physics-layer key-distribution technology, not a post-quantum algorithm. Every other apparent match was a drafting organisation's company name (several Chinese firms have "quantum" in their name) rather than a standard's actual content.
The national GB/T registry gives the same answer. Searching it directly for "anti-quantum," "post-quantum," and "lattice-based cryptography" each returned zero results, against a working search endpoint that returns real results for adjacent terms like "quantum key distribution" (27 hits) and "cryptography" generally (58 hits). The only two quantum-security GB/T standards, both published 2026, are again quantum key distribution security requirements, not post-quantum cryptography.
The algorithm competition's own deadline has passed
ICCS launched its national algorithm-selection competition in February 2025, explicitly framed as a response to the quantum threat: "为应对量子计算威胁,推动新一代商用密码算法标准制定" ("in order to respond to the threat of quantum computing, and to advance the formulation of next-generation commercial cryptographic algorithm standards"). The formal call for public-key proposals, issued 9 October 2025, set a hard deadline: "算法提案的提交截止时间为北京时间2026年6月30日24时" ("the submission deadline for algorithm proposals is 24:00 Beijing time on 30 June 2026"), after which ICCS said it would conduct a formality review and publish the candidates advancing to a first round of evaluation.
That deadline is now more than two months past, and no candidate list, shortlist, or result has been published. The competition is, if anything, expanding rather than concluding: ICCS opened a third track, for block ciphers, on 4 September 2026, at the same draft-requirements-for-comment stage the public-key track was at in February 2025. A Chinese national post-quantum standard remains, on the government's own timeline, still to be selected.
The one substantive 2026 action: funding migration research, not requiring it
SCA's Announcement No. 55, issued 30 January 2026, is the most specific PQC document SCA has published. It opens a second batch of National Cryptography Science Fund grants, including a dedicated research direction on "抗量子计算密码关键理论与技术" (key theory and technology of anti-quantum-computing cryptography) covering code-based and isogeny-based algorithm security, and a second direction specifically on migration: "典型关键信息基础设施抗量子计算密码迁移敏捷性关键技术" (key technologies for anti-quantum-computing cryptographic migration agility in typical critical information infrastructure). Funded deliverables include a tool for automatically identifying vulnerable RSA/ECC cryptography in source and binary code, and prototype cryptographic modules supporting multiple anti-quantum public-key algorithms with dynamic reconfiguration.
This is a research-funding call, not a migration mandate: it sets no deadline for any CII operator, imposes no compliance obligation, and creates no enforcement mechanism. But it is a genuine signal of state priority, and notably, China is funding tooling to discover vulnerable cryptography and support migration before it has selected the algorithm that migration would move to.
Score rationale
Each axis is scored 0–20 against the primary sources listed on this page. See the methodology for what each axis measures and how scores are derived.
| Axis | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Mandate strength | 0/20 | China's two governing cryptography statutes, the Cryptography Law and the Commercial Cryptography Regulations, contain zero mentions of quantum cryptography, and neither national standards registry (GM/T, GB/T) has a post-quantum standard. SCA's fund announcements and the ICCS algorithm competition are research and standard-setting activity, not a mandate on any regulated entity. |
| Deadline concreteness | 0/20 | No migration deadline is stated anywhere in the evidence. The one concrete date found is the algorithm competition's own submission deadline (30 June 2026), which governs proposal submission, not any organisation's migration timeline, and that deadline has itself passed without a published result. |
| Scope of coverage | 0/20 | The fund announcements scope research topics and the competition scopes algorithm submissions; neither names a compliance population or regulated sector required to act. |
| Inventory/CBOM requirement | 5/20 | Announcement No. 55's CII migration-agility research direction funds development of a tool to automatically identify vulnerable RSA/ECC cryptography in code, which is inventory-adjacent tooling, but creates no inventory obligation for any organisation. |
| Regulatory activity | 15/20 | SCA is China's real, named national cryptography authority, and has now funded two rounds of dated, specific PQC research (2023 and 2026) and stood up a live national algorithm-selection competition through its affiliated standards institute. That is more sustained regulatory engagement than a single funding announcement, but none of it yet carries an enforcement mechanism or binds any entity. |
| Total | 20/100 | A blunt sum of the five columns to its left. |
Related regulators
Sector bodies checked independently, not assumed from the primary source above.
- Has published guidance

PBOC (People's Bank of China)
PBOC's Institute of Finance (a research arm, not a regulatory department) led the drafting of 《银行业抗量子计算密码迁移管理指南》 (Banking Industry Anti-Quantum-Computing Cryptography Migration Management Guide), released 17 April 2026 as a group standard (团体标准) issued by the Jiangsu Finance Society, a provincial learned society, not PBOC itself. Group standards are voluntary; industry coverage describes backers as hoping to eventually elevate it to a binding industry standard (行业标准), which is itself an acknowledgement that it isn't one yet. It sets out overall principles for banking-sector PQC migration but does not define a CBOM-specific artifact. The registry that would carry its authoritative publication and effective dates (ttbz.org.cn) was unreachable when checked, so those specific dates rest on secondary press coverage rather than the primary registry entry.
- Not yet addressed, a gap to watch
NFRA (National Financial Regulatory Administration)
NFRA-supervised banks were listed among the participating drafting units of PBOC's group standard, but NFRA has issued nothing under its own name.
- Not yet addressed, a gap to watch
MIIT (Ministry of Industry and Information Technology)
MIIT funds a 2025 "unveil-and-lead" research program targeting quantum-resistant cryptographic chips by 2026, and administratively oversees CCSA telecom standards on quantum-secure communication, but these concern quantum key distribution infrastructure and funded research, not an MIIT-authored PQC migration mandate or CBOM requirement.
- In progress, no guidance yet
Commercial Cryptography Standards Research Institute (ICCS)
Affiliated with SCA. Launched a global algorithm-selection competition (NGCC) in February 2025 covering public-key algorithms, hash algorithms, and, from September 2026, block ciphers. The public-key track's formal call, issued 9 October 2025, set a submission deadline of 24:00 Beijing time on 30 June 2026, after which ICCS said it would publish the candidates advancing to a first round of evaluation. That deadline has passed with no candidate list, shortlist, or result of any kind published as of this page's review. This is real, dated regulatory activity toward an eventual Chinese PQC standard, but it has not yet produced one.
Notice on soliciting next-generation public-key cryptographic algorithm proposals →
FAQ: China and PQC
- Does China have a post-quantum cryptography (PQC) law?
- No. Nothing published for China carries statutory force for post-quantum cryptography as of this page's last review. What exists is non-binding guidance, set out with its primary sources below. The lead body is State Cryptography Administration (SCA / 国家密码管理局).
- What is China's PQC migration deadline?
- None. No migration deadline has been published for China by any regulator we checked, including State Cryptography Administration (SCA / 国家密码管理局).
- Does China require a Cryptographic Bill of Materials (CBOM)?
- Not as a requirement. Cryptographic inventory work does appear in the sources listed on this page, but none of it creates an obligation to produce or report one. The score rationale below quotes exactly what each source says.