PQC Security

SLH-DSA

FIPS 205

Formerly known as SPHINCS+

A stateless hash-based signature scheme treated as the conservative option: several authorities exempt it from their otherwise-universal hybrid requirement because its security rests only on hash-function security.

Approved or recommended by

United StatesNIST (FIPS)
Mandated

12 parameter sets, SHA2 and SHAKE, 128/192/256, s and f variants

Not part of CNSA 2.0 — excluded from National Security Systems use.

FIPS 205, Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard →
FranceANSSI
Recommended

Hybridation optional for SPHINCS+/SLH-DSA, unlike lattice-based schemes.

“Hybridation for SPHINCS+ may also be optional.”
ANSSI views on the Post-Quantum Cryptography transition (2023 follow-up) →
Recommended

192s/f · 256s/f, SHA2 and SHAKE

Cat 3 and 5 only; hedged. Hash-based signatures may be used alone, not hybrid.

BSI TR-02102-1, Version 2026-01 →
NetherlandsAIVD / CWI / TNO
Recommended

SLH-DSA-256 recommended

Not required to be deployed hybrid, unlike ML-DSA.

“It is not deemed necessary to deploy this scheme in a hybrid combination with elliptic curve primitives.”
The PQC Migration Handbook, 2nd edition (Dec 2024) →
SpainCCN (Centro Criptológico Nacional)
Recommended

Hybridisation not considered necessary for hash-based signatures.

CCN-TEC 009 BP/37 (July 2026) →
CanadaCanadian Centre for Cyber Security
Recommended
ITSP.40.111 →
Recommended

Named by NIST citation defining the guidance's scope; Switzerland publishes no independent algorithm list of its own.

FINMA Guidance 05/2026 (9 July 2026) →
MalaysiaCyberSecurity Malaysia (MySEAL)
Permitted
AKSA MySEAL 2.1 Approved algorithm list →

This page lists only jurisdictions we have researched and where a primary source names a position on SLH-DSA specifically. Absence from this list is not evidence a country prohibits or ignores it -- see that country's page directly.